Negotiable Instrument:
The negotiable Instruments Act
(1881) does not define a negotiable instrument but merely state that a
“negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque
payable either to order or bearer (Section- 13)
A negotiable instrument is a
transferable document that passes freely from hand to hand & forms an
integral part of the modern business mechanism.
Endorsement:
Endorsement means the signature
of the maker/ drawer or a holder of a negotiable instrument, either with or
without any writing, for the purpose of negotiation. The endorsement is done by
the payee or endorsee, as the case may be by signing on the instrument
customarily on its back & where the space is insufficient on a slip of
paper annexed thereto called “allonge”.
There are five kinds of
endorsement:
1.
Blank endorsement: If the
endorser signs his name only, the endorsement is said to be in blank and it
becomes payable to bearer, e.g. Mahbubul Haq.
2.
Special or Full endorsement:
An endorsement “in full” or a special endorsement is one where the endorser not
only puts his signature on the instrument but also writes the name of a person
to whom or to whose order the payment is to be made. Example: Pay to Mr.
Rafiqul Islam or order-Sd/Sarafat All.
3.
Conditional endorsement: In
conditional endorsement the endorser puts his signature under such a writing
which makes the transfer of title subject to fulfillment of some conditions of
the happening of some events. Example: Pay to Mr. Sarwar Jahan or order after
his marriage-Sd/Badrul Kamal.
4.
Restrictive endorsement: An
endorsement is called restrictive when the endorser restricts or prohibits
further negotiation. Example: “Pay to Miss. / A. Pereira only” Sd/Hosne Ara.
5.
Partial endorsement: In
Partial endorsement only a part of the amount of the bill is transferred or the
amount of the bill is transferred to two or more endorsees severally. This does
not separate as a negotiation of the instrument. The law lays down that an
endorsement must relate to the whole instrument. However, where the amount has
been partly paid, a note to that affect may be endorsed on the instrument which
may then be negotiated for the balance. This is not done in case of cheques or
banker’s drafts.
Give correct endorsement on
cheques payable to the order of the following:
i) M/s. Ralli;
ii) A. B. C. Co. Limited; iii) A. K. Khan & Co.; iv) A. R. Chowdhury
(non-deceased) v) The Dhaka club;
Answer:
I) For M/s. Ralli
P. Ralli
Proprietor/Partner
ii) For A. B. C. Co. Limited.
Z. H. Chowdhury
Managing
Director/Chairman
iii) For A. K. Khan & Co.
Aminul Karim
Khan
Partner
iv) A. R. Chowdhury
v) For and on behalf of
The Dhaka Club
Azizur Rashid
Treasurer
Crossing:
When an instrument bears across
its face two parallel transverse lines or an addition of the name of a Banker,
either with or without the words “& Co.”, “Account Payee” etc.
The significance of crossing is
that the payment of the instrument can only be made through a Banker( Account
Holder). When it is a crossed instrument it gives direction to the paying
Banker (Bank) to pay the money to a Banker. Thus the holder of such an
instrument must deposit the same into his or same other person’s Bank a/c for
collection. An instrument is crossed in order to provide a safeguard against
theft of fraud.
Persons who can Cross a Cheque: Crossing is an instruction or a direction to
the paying banker. Obviously, the drawer of a cheque is competent to cross it
generally or specially. Section 125, however, permits the following persons
also to cross the cheque.
(1) The holder of a cheque may
cross it generally or specially, if it is uncrossed or may cross it specially
if it is crossed generally or may add the words ‘not negotiable’ in case of
both types of crossing.
(2) The banker to whom the cheque
is crossed specially may again cross it especially to another banker, his
agent, for collection. This is called Double Special Crossing.
A general crossing may be
converted into a special crossing by a holder by adding the name of a banker to
make the payment of the cheque safer. But the reverse is not possible into a
general crossing, because such alteration amounts to a material alteration and
needs confirmation by the drawer.
Types of Crossing:
Crossing are mainly two types,
these are (i) General Crossing (ii) Special Crossing.
i)
General Crossing: Section
123 of Negotiation Instruments Act, 1881, defines a general crossing as
follows:
Where a cheque bears across its
face an addition of the words ‘and company’ or any abbreviation thereof,
between two parallel traverse lines or two parallel lines simply either with or
without the words “not negotiable” and that addition shall be deemed a crossing
and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally.
e.g. (1) (2)
& Co. (3) A/c.
Payee
(4) Payee’s Account
only (5) Not negotiable
ii
Special Crossing: Section
124 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, defines special crossing as
follows:
Where a cheque bears across its
face an addition of the name of a Banker with or without the words “not
negotiable”, that addition shall be deemed a crossing and the cheque shall be
deemed to be crossed specially and to be crossed to that Banker.
(1) Pubali Bank (2) Payee’s A/c. at Sonali
Bank
(3) Janata Bank (4) Not negotiable Agrani
Bank
Opening of Crossing: If the
crossing on a cheque is cancelled, it is called opening of the crossing. The
cheque thereafter becomes an open cheque. Only the drawer of the cheque is
entitled to open the crossing of the cheque by writing the words ‘Pay Cash’ and
canceling the crossing along with his full signature. His initials are not
sufficient for this purpose.
The paying banker must be very careful in ascertaining the validity or
genuineness of the drawer’s signature opening the crossing. If drawer’s
signature (already on the cheque) is forged by the holder in order to open the
crossing and the payment is obtained at the counter, the banker will remain
liable to the true owner of the cheque. The banker is under an obligation to
pay the cheque according to the direction of the drawer conveyed through the
crossing on the cheque.
Significance of “Not
Negotiable” Crossing:
The terms of not negotiable literally
means not transferable. But in case of crossing of a cheque or bill of
exchange, the phrase does not mean that the instrument is not at all
transferable. The instrument may still pass from hand to hand, but only with
certain degree of care and caution. According to section 130 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, any person taking a cheque crossed generally or specially with
the words ‘not negotiable’ shall not have and shall not be capable to give a
better title to the cheque than that which the person from whom he took it at
the first hand.
The cheque remains transferable
but its important quality i.e. negotiable is withdrawn. Negotiability means
that a holder in due course derives a better title than that of the transferor
provided he comes to the possession thereof for value, in good faith and
without any reason to believe that the transferor from whom he took it, had a
defective title. Not negotiable crossing destroys this feature. Suppose cheque
crossed with Not negotiable” has been stolen by B form A and handed over to C
who receives it bonafide and for value without any knowledge of B’s defective
title. C does not acquire a better title to the cheque, than B. In case of
dispute, C will have to return the cheque or pay equivalent in money to A, the
true owner of the cheque. C can not also pass a good title to any one else, say
to D.
A stolen cheque with this
crossing is just like a stolen pen and can be claimed by the true owner.
Significance of “Not
Transferable” Crossing:
Every cheque is transferable
unless it contains words prohibiting transfer or indication intention that it
shall not be transferable. If the drawer wishes to make the cheque a non
transferable one, he should indicate the fact by the way he draws the cheque
e.g. pay A or B only with further words “Not Transferable” should be plainly
written horizontally on the face of the cheque. A cheque so crossed restricts
the transferability to any other person and is only payable to the person or
payee noted therein.
Significance of “Payee’s
Account” Crossing:
Section 123 of Negotiable
Instruments Act defines that when a cheque crossed generally bears across its face
an addition of the words ‘Payee’s Account’ between the two parallel transverse
lines, it is known as Payee’s Account Crossing.
It has two characteristics:
a) It cases to be negotiable,
b)
The collecting Banker is required
to credit the proceeds thereof only to the account of the payee. The collecting
Banker will be liable if he does not adhere to this mandate of the drawer. A
cheque crossed ‘Payee’s Account’ bearing endorsements subsequent to that of the
payee proves that it has been negotiated. If such cheque is paid, the drawer is
entitled to sue for conversion. It is a notice to the collecting Banker who
will be looked upon as having acted negligently if he disregards the crossing.
very nice explanation
ReplyDeletevery good explanation
ReplyDeleteIn Bill of Exchange what is the difference between payee and endorsee; when drawer is not the payee? and what is the significance of this difference?
ReplyDeleteMost Common types of negotiable instruments are;
ReplyDelete- Promissory notes.
- Bill of exchange.
- Check.
- Government promissory notes.
- Delivery orders.
- Customs Receipts.
Most negotiable instruments fall under the following two categories; the Negotiable instrument by statute and Negotiable instruments by custom or usages.
Good explanation.. I understood
ReplyDeleteReally good, understanding language
ReplyDelete